Re: bee-repl-other-frame

Hello,

I believe newer versions of gnu emacs(such as 24.3.1)  have become much stricter in testing that the type of options match the type of values assigned them. Changing the definition of ude-repl-args in ude-repl.el from

 (defcustom ude-repl-args '()
>  "Additional arguments to the Bigloo interpreter."
>  :group 'bee
>  :type 'string)
>
>to 

(defcustom ude-repl-args "-i"
>  "Additional arguments to the Bigloo interpreter."
>  :group 'bee
>  :type 'string)
corrected the bee-repl issue I reported earlier. 

I will admit that I was thrown off track for a bit by the reference to bee-repl-other-frame in bee-autoload.el. Since we don't actually have a function by that name, it may make since to remove references to it.

Thanks,
Joseph Donaldson



>________________________________
> From: Joseph Donaldson <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 10:58 AM
>Subject: [bigloo] bee-repl-other-frame
> 
>
>
>Hello,
>
>
>Am I crazy, or Is bee-repl-other-frame not defined anywhere in bmacs? I looked back to at least version 3.7 and could not find a definition. This did not seem to cause me any problems until recently. Is anyone else having trouble with bee-rpl?
>
>
>Thanks,
>Joseph Donaldson
>
>
>
>
>
>