Re: MinGW and bigloo4.1a

Hi Joseph,

> Hello, Manuel,
> 
> I think we should hold off applying the MinGW socket changes and release
> Bigloo4.1a without them. This will give us the necessary testing time to
> prove out the changes before the next Bigloo release. In addition, we
> may be able to simplify the implementation assuming features found in
> Vista and above.
> 
> If people really need 4.1a to compile on MinGw, we can provide the
> patches with the warning that the socket changes have not been
> completely vetted.
Good. We share the same opinion. Let's do it this way.

Thanks again.

-- 
Manuel