RE: Do function fail in interpreted mode

"Ollagnon, Pierre-Francois" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.scheme.bigloo
Message-ID <AC02FE2989D7094784CAB7324190BFBF067748BC@EU-MBX-01.mgc.mentorg.com>
Hello Manuel/ Bernard.

Thanks for this fix.
I hope it will also resolve the issue I have on a "(let loop ()".

Unfortunately I have no time to look at this write now.
I have stopped to try making bigloo 4.2c working (and make a 3.1b mixed with 3.6c fixs in order to make mutex working... )
I may have more time to submit testcase for other issues in 1 or 2 weeks.

Best Regards,
Pierre


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 6:36 PM
To: Ollagnon, Pierre-Francois
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [bigloo] Do function fail in interpreted mode

Hi Pierre-Francois,

> Hello Manuel,
> 
> I am using the latest 4.3c (I am switching from an old 3.1b ...) and I face some issues so here is the first one:
> 
> 
> ;; (module test
> ;;         (main main))
> 
> ;; (define (main argv)
> ;;   (mytest "test"))
> 
> 
> (define (myprint v1 v2)
>   (print 'not-printed))
> 
> 
> (define (mytest var1)
>   (do ((i 0 (+ i 1)))
>       ((>=  (+  3 i) 5)
>        (print 'printed)
>        (myprint (print i) (print var1)) ;;myprint is not executed ??
>        ))
>   ;;If I remove the following print function the myprint works
>   (print var1) ;; var1 seems to have magically changed to 2
>   )
> 
> ;; Trace When compiled
> ;; printed
> ;; 2
> ;; test
> ;; not-printed
> ;; test
> 
> ;;Trace when not compiled:
> ;; printed
> ;; 2
> ;; test
> ;; 2
> ;; 2
We have been able to fix that bug (many thanks to Bernard). I'm preparing a new version that I will upload in a couple of minutes.

Thanks again for your report.

--
Manuel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.