Re: Compilation Issue With Bigloo4.3a

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.scheme.bigloo
Organization Inria
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Joseph,

You are just right. The typing rules are currently wrong. This can be
checked on the following:

$ cat > foo.scm
(module foo
   (export (class point (x (default 10)))
	   (foo x::point z)))

(define (foo x::point z)
   (define (bar n)
      (cons x (bar (-fx n 1))))
   (set! x (instantiate::point))
   (bar 10))
$ bigloo foo.scm -unsafe -integrate -shapet
(define (foo::obj x::point z::obj)
  (let ((x::point (make-box x::point)))
    (begin
      (let ((aux::obj
              (let ((new1050::point
                      (unsafe
                        (let ((new1049::point
                                (free-pragma
                                  "((BgL_pointz00_bglt)BREF( GC_MALLOC( sizeof(struct BgL_pointz00_bgl) )))")))
                          (begin
                            (let ((arg1062::long
                                    (let ((res1115::long
                                            (let ((class::class point::class))
                                              (|$class-index::long[::_]|
                                                ("type:" "long")
                                                class::class))))
                                      res1115::long)))
                              (let ((obj::object new1049::point)
                                    (num::long arg1062::long))
                                (|%object-class-num-set!::obj[::_]|
                                  ("type:" "obj")
                                  obj::object
                                  num::long)))
                            new1049::point)))))
                (begin
                  (setfield
                    ("BgL_xz00" obj)
                    point
                    new1050::point
                    #(10 "long" "long"))
                  #(#f "bool" "bool")
                  new1050::point))))
        (box-set! |x::point[::obj]| aux::obj))
      (bar~0::pair
        ("type:" "pair")
        x::point
        #(10 "long" "long")))))

The first let binding is wrong. It should be:
  (let ((x::cell (make-cell x::point)))
    ...)

and later on transformed into:

  (let ((x::cell (make-cell (cast obj x::point))))
    ...)

This bug has been here forever. I don't understand how it can had stayed
unnoticed so long. I will work on that problem as soon as possible.

-- 
Manuel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.