Re: CRUNCH in CHICKEN issues

On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 01:18:14PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
> On Mon Oct 20, 2025 at 9:58 PM CEST, Diogo wrote:
> >
> > I will try this. By intended style, you mean crunching small pieces of
> > code in a larger chicken program/module?
> 
> This is the way I considered, but you're use is not wrong as such,
> I just didn't test that way of usage well enough, it turns out.
> Both approaches should work, of course.
> >
> > Alternatively, I could split the modules in implementation (.scm)
> > and module definition (.sld) and include the former in the latter.
> > Then in the chicken tests, I could  (crunch (include "former.scm")).
> > Not sure if that would help though. What would be your recommendation?
> 
> It's certainly one way to approach it. In the end it depends on what
> is most convenient to you. I will investigate the problem you reported
> in any case, I'm just a bit busy in the moment, so it may take some
> time.
 
Thanks for the heads up. Please, don't worry with this at the moment.
I won't be able to work much on this pet project until December break,
anyway :)

Cheers,
-Diogo