Re: Guile FFI wrapper, t_scm_word ambiguity

Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> Sun, 01 Feb 2004 19:48:18 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.scheme.pika.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> writes:

>     > From: Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]>
>
>     > I take that back (with using t_scm_fixnum, some pieces became much
>     > more obvious to me); if you are comfortable with waiting a few days,
>     > I'll sort the fixes for Pika out of my code and will provide them as a
>     > changeset.
>
> That'll be schwell.  Thank you.
>
I'm still not totally sure how the solution should look, since there
are "raw hashes" and a "fixed hashes" are both fixnums, or have raw
hashes another type? If they have another type, which one?

Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | [email protected]      | 118634484@ICQ | [email protected]
http://yi.org/rotty      | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

Any technology not indistinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
   -- Terry Pratchett