Re: Guile FFI wrapper, t_scm_word ambiguity
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> Sun, 01 Feb 2004 19:48:18 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.pika.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> writes: > > From: Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> > > > I take that back (with using t_scm_fixnum, some pieces became much > > more obvious to me); if you are comfortable with waiting a few days, > > I'll sort the fixes for Pika out of my code and will provide them as a > > changeset. > > That'll be schwell. Thank you. > I'm still not totally sure how the solution should look, since there are "raw hashes" and a "fixed hashes" are both fixnums, or have raw hashes another type? If they have another type, which one? Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | [email protected] | 118634484@ICQ | [email protected] http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 Any technology not indistinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. -- Terry Pratchett