Re: unicode-chars.srfi

Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> writes:

>     > (Assuming intentional, the lexer already supports the latter, so I'll
>     > have to fix it to support the former if that's what you want to use
>     > instead.  Also, what about buckybits?)
> 
> Separate .srfi
> 
> 	\(C-M-U+xxxx)

Well, I assumed that would be the syntax -- that was still following
up on the line of "if \U(xxxx) is the desired syntax, how do you plan
to extend it for buckybits?", but since you said it's a typo you can
disregard that segment of the email. :-)

-jivera