Re: so... string work

Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:23:25 -0800 (PST)

Newsgroups	gmane.lisp.scheme.pika.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>


    > From: Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]>

    > I don't feel like writing another email just to reply to the proper
    > thread about this, but I just made the change so (eqv? #\U+0001
    > #\ctl-a) => #t, but should it be #\ctl-A or both or should we just
    > make the table lookup case insensitive so that #\ctl-a == #\ctl-A ==
    > #\CTL-A (and consequently #\newline == #\NEWLINE etc)?

I think that case insensitive is the only reasonable alternative
there.

#\NEWLINE == #\newline is required by R5RS, afaict.

and "ctl-a" is a character name, just like "newline".

-t