Re: string work

aaah. i see i was needlessly panicking, then! :)

sorry for the noise. i'll go on with hackerlab and strings---just
forget my previous rants :)

at any rate, Matthew, you're right in that i'll begin on the hackerlab
side, so i guess it would be no problem if you'd work on pika strings.
but, if you've got other things to do, and we're not in a hurry (and, of
course, it's ok with tom), i'd like to try my hand at the pika side too, 
and have the chance of learning about
pika in the process. my worries are that i will need twice as much time
as you to get it working, and i would hate to become a hindrance (cannot
wait to have a Pika Emacs :))

cheers,
jao

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 05:52:17PM +0100, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> The only work I've done on Pika relating topics recently brought up
> (strings + chars) is add the new codepoint names and a couple needed
> fixes for them.  I only stepped forward to claim the Pika half of
> strings because I thought you'd be working on the Hackerlab side of
> things -- I still have some numbers related issues to hammer out,
> however, so I'd be glad to free up the issue for you.
> 
> (I'm probably a little too eager in claiming a lot of the work anyways
> -- it's just that this is the first project I've been able to _really_
> get interested in and so I'm still really excited about it. :-)
> 
> -jivera
>