Re: Future of the cookbook
MJ Ray <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.plt.schematics |
|---|---|
| Organization | Very poor |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2004-03-26 20:45:24 +0000 Bruce Butterfield <bab-lsrMmtCsshhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote: > I agree that there should be a "Scheme" cookbook as well as a > "PLT-Scheme" > cookbook. Knowing that there aren't infinite resources avaliable for > writing > these I would prefer emphasis on the latter since I can find a fair > amount of > non-PLT scheme code around the web. How much that can be easily found and freely used? Are there major resources out there that I'm just missing? > [...] The argument has been made > elsewhere that R5RS defines not a language but a template that can be > expressed differently in implementation. The argument sounds like an apology for unnecessary incompatibilities from here. > [...] Turns > out there is a Sisc cookbook on their wiki and it has a few nice > recipes on > it. What a great idea! ...at least it would be, if the code had explicit reuse permission grants. Can a developer touch that without considering legal defences? :-( -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ [email protected] Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click