RE: Hosting of the cookbook
"Anton van Straaten" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.plt.schematics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brent Fulgham wrote: > However, I must admit to being a bit saddened that the > original WebIt! sources were abandoned. I really > liked the idea of creating a Scheme document that > was entirely authored and published using Scheme > software. I would be perfectly happy to discover that > the new Wiki was running under the Scheme wiki > software, but I'm pretty sure this is not the case. You're right, it's not running a Scheme wiki, although all the Scheme source code formatting is now being done by a PLT servlet. The reason we're not using a Scheme wiki is simply that we didn't have something already available that could do everything we needed. Waiting to develop something wouldn't be the quickest way to get a cookbook going. I think we can migrate towards greater use of Scheme. I've hinted in this direction on the AdminCookbookViews page. In thinking about how that should work, I noticed that something pretty similar to WebIt's markup could work well for defining our index layout, and I've just added a comment to that page giving an example of what I'm thinking of. In the longer term, we have a bunch of tools that we could exploit and use to make a more Scheme-based site, including Moshi, WebIt!, SSAX, HTMLPrag, SchemeRSS. The current Scheme-based source code formatting was partially intended as a proof-of-concept of integrating Scheme usage with the TWiki server. That's worked well, and the approach can be extended to do other things with Scheme. If we reach a point where we have entire pages served by Scheme, it would be easy enough to integrate things so that some pages are served directly by Scheme, and others by the TWiki server. We could use the InterWiki mechanism to allow wikilinks between the two. > Now, I've been basically a bump on a log, and haven't > contributed anything concrete recently so please take > my comments in the relatively "all-talk, no action" > fashion they should be! :-) That's fine with me. I don't want my previous comments to be misinterpreted as thinking I don't want to hear from anyone who isn't offering action. The more opinions we hear, the better we can make the cookbook. My earlier reactions were to some comments which didn't seem constructive to me. Anton ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297