RE: Hosting of the cookbook
MJ Ray <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.plt.schematics |
|---|---|
| Organization | Very poor |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2004-04-23 19:24:27 +0100 Anton van Straaten <[email protected]> wrote: >> The WebIt sources were ignored and forgotten about, >> but are basically easy to read and comprehend. > IMO, the wiki format is less cluttered and easier to deal with for the > purposes of actually writing and editing the content of recipes. For > example, we no longer have to wrap each paragraph in a (paragraph > [...]) > expression. You aren't contradicting me, so I assume you agree? > You previously wrote "I have been put off [updating the Cookbook] > because > of the need to learn things I don't know and something I won't use > commercially (WebIt)". Perhaps you feel the same way about Twiki, but > then the same would be true of any system we choose, other than a wiki > you're already familiar with. Afaict, none of those seemed to have > the > kinds of features we wanted. Yes, Twiki shares the previously mentioned problems, but maybe they're unavoidable for this task. Twiki is actually worse on this aspect, though: it's not even comprehensible without a sort of dictionary to hand. I would never have guessed trying --++-- for a heading, for example. >> Little seems to be done to prevent the problem of >> forgetting about them from happening again, > I don't understand this concern. Making the content available in a > wiki-like format is specifically intended to make it more accessible, > get > more people interested, and make it much less likely that it be > forgotten > about. The activity so far is initial evidence of success here. There is no evidence for this yet: it's simply too early. However, we still have no activity measures and rely on the people working on it to tell us when they no longer have time again, which still seems a bit unsafe. I suggest measuring and reporting activity to schematics-development at some reasonable interval, preferably automatically, so we can act if it says "Schematician edits: 0%" or whatever we think is a questionable level. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ [email protected] Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297