Re: PLT-specificness (Was: Welcome to UNAM)
MJ Ray <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.plt.schematics |
|---|---|
| Organization | Very poor |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2004-05-10 16:22:14 +0100 Neil W. Van Dyke <[email protected]> wrote: > Personally, I suspect a PLT-specific cookbook would be more viable > than an implementation-independent or multiple-implementation one. Why do you suspect that? Some people wrote that broadening access was a desirable trait and multiple-implementation seems a good way to do it. > 1. Avoid *totally* gratuitous PLT-isms. [...] Oh, yes please. Even when I write for MzScheme, I hate square brackets. Those sharp corners could take your eye out. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3