Re: SRFI 29 Localization Bugs

Noel Welsh wrote:
> --- Sylvain Beucler <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I am willing to help fixing those.
> This is probably the quickest way to get the fixes you
> desire :)  As the SRFI implementations have migrated
> into the PLT Scheme CVS I'm not sure if the canonical
> version is stored in our CVS or theirs.  I hope others
> on this list can clarify the situation (you know who
> you are).  This in turn will indicate if it is worth
> you signing up to Sourceforge to become a Schematics
> developer.

I am currently waiting for an answer from PLT to know how to localize  
our software efficently - the main concern being encodings and changes  
from v2xx to v3xx.

Depending on how they really plan to use Unicode in the next version of  
PLT Scheme, I will either use SRFI 29 or adapt an existing gettext  
bindings for MzScheme.

Anyway, I am still willing to fix SRFI 29, abeilt I will not work on it  
right now in the latter case. Getting access to either CVS repository  
should not be necessary as the code is not very long and the fix could  
be discussed, for example, on this mailing-list.

-- 
Sylvain


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click