RE: possible domain name - opinions?
"Anton van Straaten" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.plt.schematics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-06-01 18:52:17 +0100 Anton van Straaten > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > schematics.appsolutions.com, for example, which now returns > > a permanent redirect to schemecookbook.org > > Should that be www.schemewiki.org, or at least www.schemecookbook.org? I don't think the canonical name for the cookbook has actually been decided on, I just picked one more or less arbitrarily. I noticed that "schemecookbook.org" is the same length as "www.schemewiki.org", and it's more cookbook-specific, whereas e.g. cookbook.schemewiki.org is longer. We had also discussed variations like plt.schemewiki.org. My feeling is that the canonical name we use for the actual cookbook should ideally reflect that it refers to the cookbook - possibly using the word "cookbook", but that's pretty long. If possible, it might also reflect the PLT orientation. Then again, plt.schemecookbook.org is kinda long and the "plt" part might throw people off. Should we consider the shorter schemebook.(org|com), which is also available? As a data point, I notice that both "www.wikipedia.org" and "wikipedia.org" redirect me to en.wikipedia.org (i.e. English). But I never type "en.wikipedia.org" to get there, mainly because I usually don't pay much attention to the redirection. Perhaps everyone should post their top three favorites for a canonical name for the cookbook, and we can decide from there... Anton ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click