Re: srfi-0 and srfi-7
Michael Sperber <sperber-jNDFPZUTrfQQDnmTUQnR1uqEdJ8o/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.plt.schematics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Neil" == Neil W Van Dyke <[email protected]> writes: Neil> 1. In PLT 207's standard SRFI-7 source, I see a reference to "MJ Ray's Neil> code for SRFI 0", but no SRFI-0 "cond-expand" anywhere. Was the Neil> omission of SRFI-0 intentional? Yes; MJ was really implementing SRFI 7 but didn't realize it, which is why the code was moved (at least in spirit). SRFI 0 isn't really implementable in any useful way in PLT Scheme. Neil> 2. Has anyone *used* the SRFI-7 implementation in PLT? Yes; I got plenty of bug reports in the beginning, at least. Neil> 3. Are SRFI-0/7 feature names for MzScheme-specific extensions defined? Neil> I don't see any in "features.ss". No, and for good reason. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504