Re: srfi licensing
Michael Sperber <sperber-jNDFPZUTrfQQDnmTUQnR1uqEdJ8o/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.plt.schematics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "MJ" == MJ Ray <[email protected]> writes: MJ> What was the intention? If it was to prevent SRFI-unrelated MJ> incompatible derived works of the reference implementations, then that MJ> is surely not free software No, it doesn't. The FAQ spells this out, if anyone considers it necessary. MJ> The current licence does not seem the best way to preserve the MJ> integrity of the standards documents. Well, I'm sure the license has its faults. On the other hand, it's there now, it's attached to 50+ SRFIs, and we know what it means. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn