RE: bug involving assert-equals? and map

--- Ryan Culpepper <ryan_sml-/[email protected]> wrote:


> As an alternative, we could use identifier macros to turn
> other
> occurrences of assert-equal? into functions like the one
> above. I'll
> try to add that and check it in tonight. That will also
> eliminate the
> need for the assert-equal?* variant, if that's still
> around.
> 
> Any objections?

No objections here, but the portable version of SchemeUnit
would probably need to keep the function variants around;
AFAIK identifier macros are PLT specific.

Noel

=====
Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com
AIM: noelhwelsh


		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo! Shopping.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php