SRFI 19
David Van Horn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.plt.schematics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Could srfi 19 be packaged like srfi 1, ie. two modules, one that provides the names as defined in the srfi document and another that provides prefixed identifiers? Since it seems common to have surfies define names that conflict with MzScheme primitives, could this become a consistent practice? Also, perhaps a better prefix could be used throughout. I'd prefer srfi-n: to s: and tm:. (I'm using the version of srfi 19 included in the latest PLT cvs sources; my apologies if this has already been addressed.) Thanks, David ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click