Re: Re: Switch to Subversion (!!!!!!!!!)
Anton van Straaten <[email protected]> Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:05:09 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.plt.schematics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
MJ Ray wrote: > Anton van Straaten <[email protected]> [...] > >>irrelevant license issues and dark mutterings about data loss; [...] > > > Irrelevant to you, maybe, but I usually operate version control > from inside my code editors, rather than remembering arcane > command line flags or firing up a different app just to do > version control. SVN is worse to integrate and much larger > footprint than CVS or many of its next-generation competitors. What does that have to do with license issues? There's integration between emacs and SVN, for example. Are you saying that SVN would have a smaller footprint if it used the GPL instead of an Apache/BSD-style license? Perhaps I'm missing something, but it certainly appears to me that license issues are irrelevant here. Anton ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642