Re: Alternatives to DrRacket
Konrad Hinsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.racket.user,gmane.lisp.scheme.plt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 26/11/2017 16:42, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > I know two big reasons for using a complex tool is it’s stickiness > factors; normally a combination of familiarity (hence speed) with a lot > of powerful features and non-transportable customisation. A third big reason is generality. The main reason why I prefer Emacs to DrRacket is that it does so many things unrelated to Racket. Anything that requires a text-based interface can be done in Emacs. > Putting stickiness factors aside, what features in other editors/IDE’s > would you like to see in DrRacket? Since I do use DrRacket from time to time for very Racket-specific things (e.g. the debugger and the macro stepper), I do have a small wishlist: 1) Paredit mode like in Emacs, sufficiently compatible that I can switch seamlessly between the two. Well, that's it. Just one point. Konrad. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/[email protected] For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.