Types of languages Re: the list of languages made with racket [Hacker News]

Stephen De Gabrielle <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.racket.user,gmane.lisp.scheme.plt
Message-ID <CAGHj7-L4Juvaxt_q2a5DuPVBxBvymi05CAxOLj5S7W3JVoU_Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Matthias,
(or anyone else who is available to answer :))

I'm trying to get my head around the range of possible languages in Racket.

You got me thinking how many languages seem to have embedded little
languages.
I was wondering how they fit into your categories of languages?

3. The nature of languages ranges from
>         — stand-alone languages with ugly syntax (example: datalog)
>         — #lang stand-alone DSLs (config, scribble)
>

Does '#lang
<https://docs.racket-lang.org/guide/Module_Syntax.html#%28part._hash-lang%29>
 video' fit in this group?

        — #lang language mixins (s-expr, 2d)
>

Do regular #px""/#rx expressions fit in this category?

        — embedded DSLs with mostly coarse-grained interactions with Racket
> (redex)
>

would racket/class fit in this group?
would (require
<https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/require.html#%28form._%28%28lib._racket%2Fprivate%2Fbase..rkt%29._require%29%29>
 sql <https://docs.racket-lang.org/sql/>) fit in this group?

        — embedded DSLs with fine-grained interaction with Racket (the
> language of class syntax; syntax-parse: the pattern and templated
> languages, which interact via syn-pattern vars)
>

Do regular #px""/#rx expressions fit in this category?


>         All of these are available via libraries. And I am almost sure I
> am forgetting some classes of languages here.


Kind regards,

Stephen

PS I need to add minipascal to
https://github.com/racket/racket-lang-org/pull/89


On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 11:08 PM Matthias Felleisen <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> The ycombinator post shows so many misunderstandings of the basic issue,
> it’s seriously sad. Here are some:
>
> 1. S-expression syntax does not mean it’s the same semantics.
> 2. The means of implementation in Racket are radically different from a
> lexer-parser approach.
> 3. The nature of languages ranges from
>         — stand-alone languages with ugly syntax (example: datalog)
>         — #lang stand-alone DSLs (config, scribble)
>         — #lang language mixins (s-expr, 2d)
>         — embedded DSLs with mostly coarse-grained interactions with
> Racket (redex)
>         — embedded DSLs with fine-grained interaction with Racket (the
> language of class syntax; syntax-parse: the pattern and templated
> languages, which interact via syn-pattern vars)
>         All of these are available via libraries. And I am almost sure I
> am forgetting some classes of languages here.
>
> I suspect that if we collected the languages in just these categories,
> we’d easily find over a hundred if not several hundred in both our code
> base as well as external code repos.
>
> Thanks for taking up the battle against this lack of knowledge out there —
> Matthias
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/[email protected]
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.