Re: Is it possible to sell commercial use rights to an open source Racket package?
Matthew Butterick <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.racket.user,gmane.lisp.scheme.plt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bradley Kuhn, director of the SFC, has explained why FLOSS projects don't need CLAs, along with some underlying legal truths about FLOSS contributions. [1] [1] https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2014/jun/09/do-not-need-cla/ <https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2014/jun/09/do-not-need-cla/> > On 23 Aug 19, at 12:29 PM, Alexis King <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe so, but that is, in fact, why I sent the email. I was hoping you could clue me in as to what I was missing. (Maybe it’s unfair of me to ask you for free legal analysis, but I don’t feel like it’s all that unreasonable to ask for just a little clarification here.) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/[email protected] To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/D77638C7-BF30-4E03-9F57-4090C061DB05%40mbtype.com.