Re: SIGSEGV trying to bootstrap Scheme48 from VCS

>>>>> Michael Sperber <[email protected]> writes:

 >>>>> How did you build the running Scheme 48 from the development code
 >>>>> itself?

 >>>> The same way as I've tried to build the development version of
 >>>> Scheme48 with itself later (already posted to this thread), only
 >>>> using Scheme48 1.8 as the basis.

[...]

 >>> So *how* did you build the development version that crashed? :-)

 >> I guess, I'm now the one confused with the question.

 >> The development code that crashed was built the way just like the
 >> one I've used to build the development code with itself, i. e.:

 > I think I somehow got into a mind state where I believed you're doing
 > all of this on Windows: sorry about that.  On what platform are you
 > doing it?

	I do it on GNU/Linux, as of Debian Etch (amd64 port.)

	As I was suspicious about possible bugs within the new FFI
	(well, what's the most likely place for bugs which lead to
	segmentation faults, anyway?), I've build Scheme48 as of
	6ab92621cc7c [1].  It wasn't a big surprise that /that/ version
	did indeed compile itself fine.

	So, there're 45 changesets more to check.  It seems that 5 to 6
	double-builds will be enough to locate the faulty one.

[1] http://www.deinprogramm.de/cgi-bin/hgs48.cgi/rev/6ab92621cc7c7c22131e4beceb90dba8cc9f47e9