Re: maybe-commit-and-make-ready-and-block
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:38:40 -0400 From: Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> That would make MAYBE-COMMIT-AND-MAKE-READY-AND-BLOCK mostly unnecessary, as well as MAYBE-COMMIT-AND-MAKE-READY and MAYBE-COMMIT-AND-CHANNEL-{READ,WRITE}... On second thought, of course this wouldn't obviate the need for MAYBE-COMMIT-AND-CHANNEL-READ. And of course there are plenty of problems with making these hooks compose in a nice way. E.g., perhaps there are ordering constraints on the procedures to be run on success or failure, which are not related to the order in which I added them to the hooks. But I'd still like a PROVISIONAL-MAKE-READY (and maybe a pony).