Re: maybe-commit-and-make-ready-and-block

Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48
Message-ID <[email protected]>
   Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:38:40 -0400
   From: Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]>

   That would make MAYBE-COMMIT-AND-MAKE-READY-AND-BLOCK mostly
   unnecessary, as well as MAYBE-COMMIT-AND-MAKE-READY and
   MAYBE-COMMIT-AND-CHANNEL-{READ,WRITE}...

On second thought, of course this wouldn't obviate the need for
MAYBE-COMMIT-AND-CHANNEL-READ.  And of course there are plenty of
problems with making these hooks compose in a nice way.  E.g., perhaps
there are ordering constraints on the procedures to be run on success
or failure, which are not related to the order in which I added them
to the hooks.  But I'd still like a PROVISIONAL-MAKE-READY (and maybe
a pony).
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.