Re: &os-error conditions contain integers, not errnos
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:55:52 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 23:21, Michael Sperber <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Roderic Morris <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > I'm not sure if this is the intended behavior, but it seems that it'd >> > make more sense for them to contain errnos so handlers can use the >> > errno api on them directly. >> >> Yes, but I haven't figured out how to do that without loading the POSIX >> package into the default image, which isn't an option. I guess there >> needs to be some kind of hook, but I haven't had time to investigate >> that avenue. I'm happy to hear suggestions on how to resolve the issue. >> > > The meaning of the OS-ERROR-CODE field is OS-dependent as well -- on > Windows, it is the result of GetLastError or WSAGetLastError. Right - that further complicates the issue. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla