Re: misleading error message "ill-formed definition"

Michael Sperber <[email protected]> Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:40:33 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Robert Ransom <[email protected]> writes:

> On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 17:07:18 -0500
> Jonathan Rees <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  > (let () 1 (define x 2) 3)
>> 
>> Warning: ill-formed definition
>>           (define x 2)
>>           (&syntax-error)
>> 3
>>  >
>> 
>> The definition is perfectly well formed; the problem is with its  
>> appearance in this particular context.
>
> I have attached to this message a patch and bundle to fix this bug.

Applied and pushed.  Thanks!

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla