Re: Scheme 48 development?

Jonathan Rees <[email protected]> Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:53:50 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48
Message-ID <[email protected]>
OK, I think I've finally fixed this.

I moved the 2008 site snapshot to a different directory, so if anyone  
stumbles on it they'll see 'snapshot' in the pathname at least, and  
most of the files will have disappeared from where they were  
before...  and I set up an index page that sends you to the real  
site.  Also a trampoline page for development.html.

Tried using .htaccess to set up redirects but apparently the server  
isn't configured to let me do that.

Best
Jonathan


On Jan 4, 2011, at 2:32 AM, Hans Nowak wrote:

> On 1/3/11 3:33 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:
>
>> Hans Nowak<[email protected]>  writes:
>>
>>> I am asking because the latest stable version (1.8) is almost three
>>> years old.  So I went to the development page and tried the links
>>> listed there:
>>>
>>> http://www.deinprogramm.de/cgi-bin/hgs48-stable.cgi
>>> http://www.deinprogramm.de/cgi-bin/hgs48.cgi
>>
>> That must have been a while ago.  The current development page at:
>>
>> http://www.s48.org/development.html
>>
>> lists
>>
>> Stable/release repository:
>> http://www.s48.org/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/s48-stable
>> Development:
>> http://www.s48.org/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/s48
>
> !!  Yes, these do work for me.  I was looking at:
>
> http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/projects/s48/development.html
>
> which still shows the old links.  Incidentally, when you google for
> 'scheme 48', that site is the first that comes up.  That would explain
> the confusion...  I was assuming that s48.org was simply an alias for
> the aforementioned site.
>
>> ... and these work.  The current state of the development  
>> repository is
>> very close to what will be the 1.9 release.  I'm working on the  
>> release
>> engineering, but it's going slowly due to a new job.  Significant  
>> work
>> has also been done in one or two other branches.
>
> That is good to know.  I will be checking out the development code
> shortly. :)  Thanks for your quick reply!
>
> --
> Hans Nowak