Re: external events api

>>>>>"RM" == Roderic Morris <[email protected]> writes:
RM> Should've replied to this sooner, but I've been busy. I think we
RM> have a misunderstanding.

Now I've been away, so it took me a while to respond.  Sorry for the
misunderstanding.

RM> I understand that. The problem is that some of those calls are *never*
RM> handled. I've left the process idling for quite a while without them
RM> being woken. Moreover, after the first time a thread fails to wake up,
RM> all subsequent calls to s48_note_external_event have no effect, even
RM> on brand new event ids.

I've seen some commits you've made in the last weeks, do these commits
improve the situation?  (Sorry, no time to test myself, yet.)

-- 
Marcus