Re: Changeset 0306c5a64775

On 2012-01-10, Robert Ransom <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2012-01-08, Michael Sperber <[email protected]> wrote:

>> That also makes sense, but if we're talking about "external event of
>> some sort", rather than *the* external events (i.e. the specific
>> things in scheme/rts/external-event.scm)  then the fix should also
>> happen outside of external-event.scm, deeper down in the thread system,
>> is my current thinking.  Does that make sense?
>
> It makes sense to keep that mechanism separate from the
> external-events package.  See my (revised)
> wait-for-child-process-deadlock-fix branch (attached, and pushed using
> hg-git to https://git.torproject.org/user/rransom/scheme48.git) for
> that.

I've found some bugs in this branch; I'll send a revised branch soon.


Robert Ransom