Re: Changeset 0306c5a64775

On 2012-01-11, Robert Ransom <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2012-01-10, Robert Ransom <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 2012-01-08, Michael Sperber <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> That also makes sense, but if we're talking about "external event of
>>> some sort", rather than *the* external events (i.e. the specific
>>> things in scheme/rts/external-event.scm)  then the fix should also
>>> happen outside of external-event.scm, deeper down in the thread system,
>>> is my current thinking.  Does that make sense?
>>
>> It makes sense to keep that mechanism separate from the
>> external-events package.  See my (revised)
>> wait-for-child-process-deadlock-fix branch (attached, and pushed using
>> hg-git to https://git.torproject.org/user/rransom/scheme48.git) for
>> that.
>
> I've found some bugs in this branch; I'll send a revised branch soon.

See attached.


Robert Ransom