SCSH status and future
Lionel Elie Mamane <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:02:40 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.scsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Until a few months ago, I was a quite happy user of scsh. (I'm also the main maintainer of the Debian package of scsh.) Any script I was doing (that didn't have to be embedded in a Makefile) for my own use was done in scsh. Both long term scripts (e.g. backup) or throw-away (just typed on the command line, executed once and never saved). I was dreaming of scsh every time I was forced to write a serious bash (or even worse - POSIX /bin/sh) script. But in a short time, this all changed. The machine I backup _to_ is now an amd64 machine. I cannot use scsh for my backup scripts now. My main desktop is also a amd64 machine. I cannot use scsh for my throw-away execute-once scripts. And I don't know of a good replacement. (I removed features from my backup script to shoehorn it into guile + a compatibility layer.) Unless scsh gets portability to 64 bits machines on the middle term, I think it will slowly fade into oblivion. It would be a shame. Anybody wants to make an scsh (_with_ the process notation) on top of another scheme than the old scheme48 it is now based on? -- Lionel