Re: SRFI-48 incorrect mutation of literal list in example?

John Cowan <[email protected]> Fri, 1 Jan 2016 01:00:29 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.scheme.srfi.srfi-48
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sudarshan S Chawathe scripsit:

> I realize this SRFI has been finalized for a while (and I am not aware
> of any protocol for errata),=20

De facto, this is the right way to announce errors.  Eventually `format`
and `fmt` will probably go head-to-head for R7RS-large after `fmt`
becomes a SRFI some time next year.

> [I guess this "outs" me as a format string user.  I promise to use it
> only very sparingly and cautiously, and I will try to kick the habit in
> the new year.]

I don't use either `format` or `fmt` myself, but there are `fmt`
implementations for several Schemes, so I'd be interested to know
what you think if and when you try `fmt` out.

--=20
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        [email protected]
O beautiful for patriot's dream that sees beyond the years
Thine alabaster cities gleam undimmed by human tears!
America! America!  God mend thine every flaw,
Confirm thy soul in self-control, thy liberty in law!
        --one of the verses not usually taught in U.S. schools