Re: SRFI-48 incorrect mutation of literal list in example?
John Cowan <[email protected]> Fri, 1 Jan 2016 01:00:29 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.srfi.srfi-48 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sudarshan S Chawathe scripsit: > I realize this SRFI has been finalized for a while (and I am not aware > of any protocol for errata),=20 De facto, this is the right way to announce errors. Eventually `format` and `fmt` will probably go head-to-head for R7RS-large after `fmt` becomes a SRFI some time next year. > [I guess this "outs" me as a format string user. I promise to use it > only very sparingly and cautiously, and I will try to kick the habit in > the new year.] I don't use either `format` or `fmt` myself, but there are `fmt` implementations for several Schemes, so I'd be interested to know what you think if and when you try `fmt` out. --=20 John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] O beautiful for patriot's dream that sees beyond the years Thine alabaster cities gleam undimmed by human tears! America! America! God mend thine every flaw, Confirm thy soul in self-control, thy liberty in law! --one of the verses not usually taught in U.S. schools