A new release of SSAX and related tools
[email protected] Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.ssax-sxml |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello! There have been a few improvements to SSAX and SXML tools since the release of SSAX v4.9 two years ago. I've been holding a new release because I wanted to re-write all low-level macros into syntax-rules. Low-level macros is the last hurdle in unifying various SSAX distributions (especially Gambit's distribution and Mike Sperber's ones). The re-writing is under way: I re-wrote run-test (which makes '"String" a case-sensitive symbol String on any R5RS Scheme system) and a few other macros. I have come to realize that it would take longer than I expected. First, it would probably take some two-three weeks to finish the re-writing (more likely like two or three days but I don't want to over-commit). Most importantly, it would take time to verify that the resulting syntax-rules run on all Scheme systems of interest. I have discovered that there are some variations in the implementation of syntax-rules among Scheme systems. Some differences stem from the fact syntax-rules aren't specified in R5RS precisely enough. There are some dark corners. Perhaps a better course of action is to release SSAX as it is and make another release when the re-writing of macros is finished. The latter release should be R5RS compliant and should work with Scheme48 and Petite Chez systems (among many others) as it is. I use Scheme48 and Petite Chez as a yardstick of R5RS (I can't use SISC because Java doesn't work well on FreeBSD). Thus I plan by this coming Friday or Monday to tag the SSAX CVS repository with a RELEASE-4A tag. Kirill and I can work on turning the corresponding code into release files. It might seem a good idea to separate SXML-related code from the proper SSAX code. OTH, there is a significant overlap between the code bases. I don't know what's better: one distribution file as it is now or several? After the tagging, I'll import some of the code with re-written macros. This will give us the opportunity to test the macros on various systems to make sure they run on all of them. Cheers, Oleg ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf