Re: Re: case-sensitivity of special symbols in SXML
Michael Sperber <sperber-jNDFPZUTrfQQDnmTUQnR1uqEdJ8o/[email protected]> Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:23:39 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.ssax-sxml |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Neil" == Neil W Van Dyke <[email protected]> writes: Neil> 1. The SSAX packaging for the Scheme implementation that I use most Neil> often (MzScheme 209) has switched to emitting lowercase "*top*" (and Neil> related SXML symbols). I don't know what you mean by "has switched". The packaging that has been merged into the PLT distribution has always been case-insensitive. Neil> This means that, in case-sensitive code using Neil> the SSAX library, I actually need to refer to "*top*" rather than Neil> "*TOP*", which is not consistent with your sensible convention of Neil> using the same case everywhere for the symbol. Unfrotunately, the converse problem is just about the same: Were *TOP* case-sensitive, I couldn't refer to it by *TOP* in case-insensitive code. Instead, I'd have to say (string->symbol "*TOP*") or something. I see your dilemma, but I don't see a solution that fits everyone's needs. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl