Re: XML parsing bug?
Oleg Parashchenko <olpa-1YK4M1/[email protected]> Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:40:30 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.ssax-sxml |
|---|---|
| Organization | private person |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Oleg, thank you for the explanation. On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:18:58 -0700 (PDT) [email protected] wrote: ... > > So, you my wish to re-define ssax:xml->sxml in your project to call > ssax:reverse-collect-str function. Or, add the definition > > (define ssax:reverse-collect-str-drop-ws ssax:reverse-collect-str) As space elimination is often a good thing, I decided to implement a conditional approach. In a private copy of code, I changed (let ((seed (ssax:reverse-collect-str-drop-ws seed)) to (let ((seed ((if (tag-drops-xml-space? elem-gi) ssax:reverse-collect-str-drop-ws ssax:reverse-collect-str) seed)) where "tag-drops-xml-space?" is something like (define tag-drops-xml-space? (let ((drop-list (map add-my-ns (list "chapter" "subchapter" ...)))) (lambda (elem-gi) (let ((full-gi (if (pair? elem-gi) (string->symbol (string-append (symbol->string (car elem-gi)) ":" (symbol->string (cdr elem-gi)))) elem-gi))) (memq full-gi drop-list))))) ... > > To recap: the observed behavior is intentional. There is a way to > change it. > > Cheers, > Oleg -- Oleg Parashchenko olpa@ http://uucode.com/ http://uucode.com/blog/ XML, TeX, Python, Mac, Chess ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K The only unified storage solution that offers unified management Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev