Re: An alternative syntax for aux-list

Hello!

> I think our app will work with the new aux node format as well,
> as far as we rewrite the producers to adapt to the new format.
> It would be nicer to have migration period, though, to have a
> version that accept both representation.

The latter goes without saying. Absolutely there will be a migration
period -- once there is a general agreement that the migration is
worthwhile, that is. Potentially, it might be: the new format seems to
offer a degree a conceptual unification and might make SXPath
simpler. I can only say at this point that the proposal doesn't seem
to irreparably break anything. Do you think the proposal has merits
that offset the cost of changing the applications that do break?



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html