Re: SLY, a fork of SLY

João Távora <[email protected]> writes:

> Zach,
>
> OK, thanks for the heads up
>
> I will try to make SLY installable via Emac's built-in mechanism
> basically "M-x package-install RET sly RET"

That's good, but I think Quicklisp availability has some advantages,
too. Quicklisp supports going back to previous versions, for example;
you can say "Give me the library state-of-the-world from June, 2013" and
match it up to a project's API requirements.

I'm not that familiar with the Emacs package system, so maybe it
provides something like that, too.

Zach

_______________________________________________
Slime-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/slime-devel