Re: SLY, a fork of SLY
[email protected] (João Távora)
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.slime.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Helmut Eller <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, Sep 07 2014, João Távora wrote: > > [..,] >> My reticence to this particular renaming stems from the fact that the >> RPC protocol between Emacs and the Lisp process is itself based on the >> identifier "swank" *and* on its package-designating quality. This is an >> example of what goes on the > wire >> >> (:emacs-rex (swank:connection-info) nil t 1) >> >> If I blindly rename "swank-">"slynk" in all symbols, packages and parts >> of symbols, as is being requested, SLY will be immediately locked out of >> the existing communication protocol. > > In swank-rpc.lisp is a function SIMPLE-READ that can be used to parse > the string that comes from the wire. You could replace the call to > INTERN there with something that splits the string at the #\: and then > map "SWANK" or other package qualifiers to your own packages. It is an interesting hack indeed. Thanks. > Doesn't sound so hard and it would not need any conflicting package > nicknames. Well, I would still need to rename the rex requests themselves as in (sly-eval `(swank:list-all-package-names t))) So as to comply with your "part of symbols names" demand and, more importantly, to keep `sly-edit-definition' capabilities. This last bit is, incidently, one of the drawbacks of your previous solution compared to nicknaming packages, since for anyone looking at the wire (e.g. *events* buffer) strings would SIMPLE-READ to completely disparate symbols. Now, imagine there is indeed a SWANK server running int the Lisp image and the confusion this could cause. Would this be easier to debug than an early abortive "Can't create package because there is a conflict" error? After having done that, I would need the reverse indirection in `sly-net-send`, and would have to walk the sexp there, since some extensions "abuse" it and send nested sexps. As I said, not hard, but also not trivial to consider the consequences. João _______________________________________________ Slime-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/slime-devel