Re: Freeze for SLIME 2.10 and a heads up
Marco Antoniotti <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.slime.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
A bit off topic… Didn't at a certain point “hierarchical packages” appear in several implementations? And wasn’t the dot #\. the separator character used in those cases? Cheers — MA On Oct 9, 2014, at 24:16 , Helmut Eller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08 2014, Luís Oliveira wrote: > >> Helmut, adding a swank-backend nickname to swank/backend would >> probably fix most of these. Would you be OK with adding such a >> nickname to ease the migration? > > That's OK with me. Though, I consider the swank/FOO packages internal > interfaces that are needed to implement SWANK but are not an API for > third party code. > > Helmut > > _______________________________________________ > Slime-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/slime-devel -- Marco Antoniotti