Re: M-. vs readtable on SBCL
[email protected] (Gábor Melis)
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.slime.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Helmut Eller <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 27 2015, Gábor Melis wrote: > >> Maintainers, everyone, I'm not sure about the two KLUDGEs related to >> accessing stuff from the SWANK package. What's the best way to deal with >> them? > > Either pass the context in as argument or create a new back-end function > that the front-end must call first to configure the back-end. Both look > rather clumsy in this case. As expected: reader macros attract kludges > like shit attracts flies. Thanks. I removed one of the kludges by using SWANK/BACKEND:*DEBUG-SWANK-BACKEND*. The cure for the other was worse than the disease, so that remains. Xach, this has the side effect of fixing the interning problem. https://github.com/slime/slime/pull/224 I consider this final, unless there is an unexpected problem with it. _______________________________________________ Slime-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/slime-devel