Re: using (in-readtable) to select a readtable

Attila Lendvai <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:03:03 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.slime.devel
Message-ID <CAE4vfcLW6nPHbAOM0euu+HN7yv7qTn0cEoNk6AeRA+OtmZWZGQ@mail.gmail.com>
> I think we should try and deprecate *readtable-alist* but keep it

i'd like to speak up against deprecation.

my reason: in-readtable gives a high resolution for reader control,
but i think such a high resolution is often not needed. e.g. i'm
perfectly happy with our current setup where the package also defines
the readtable, and thus one doesn't need to copy-paste an in-readtable
form into every file.

such a setup would be impossible without *readtable-alist* or an
equivalent infrastructure.

-- 
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
--
“The meta-Turing test counts a thing as intelligent if it seeks to
apply Turing tests to objects of its own creation.”
	— Lew Mammel, Jr.