Re: using (in-readtable) to select a readtable
Attila Lendvai <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:03:03 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.slime.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAE4vfcLW6nPHbAOM0euu+HN7yv7qTn0cEoNk6AeRA+OtmZWZGQ@mail.gmail.com> |
> I think we should try and deprecate *readtable-alist* but keep it i'd like to speak up against deprecation. my reason: in-readtable gives a high resolution for reader control, but i think such a high resolution is often not needed. e.g. i'm perfectly happy with our current setup where the package also defines the readtable, and thus one doesn't need to copy-paste an in-readtable form into every file. such a setup would be impossible without *readtable-alist* or an equivalent infrastructure. -- • attila lendvai • PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39 -- “The meta-Turing test counts a thing as intelligent if it seeks to apply Turing tests to objects of its own creation.” — Lew Mammel, Jr.