Re: using (in-readtable) to select a readtable

It doesn't ignore it. If *READTABLE-ALIST* is indeed used for
source-code navigation,
than the CL code responsible for that is already enclosed in
WITH-BUFFER-SYNTAX,
and thus SLY will consider whatever readtable indication travelled
down the wire.

BTW it's not SLY that provides support for NAMED-READTABLES, it's the
external contrib
I pointed to.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:51 PM, 73budden . <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suppose that *readtable-alist* is used for proper navigation on SBCL
> sources. If so, *readtable-alist* is rather important. If SLY ignores
> *readtable-alist* this may lead to incorrect code navigation in SBCL
> sources. But I don't know exactly.



-- 
João Távora