Re: SLIME + Named readtables
Luís Oliveira <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Aug 2017 19:02:43 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.slime.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAB-HnLSv-B87een64T-ODVDY3BF2eO54p2EsprR523K-KgS+qg@mail.gmail.com> |
Tracking in-readtable forms and passing the readtable designator along in evaluation/compilation requests sounds consensual. Let's start with that, what do you think? Cheers, Luís On Fri, Aug 18, 2017, 17:15 73budden . <[email protected]> wrote: > Good idea, but this PR does not implement my current suggestion. I > have to work on code for a while. Before I start, I'd like to know do > you (or does anyone) see any more issues with the solution described? > > 2017-08-18 16:39 GMT+03:00, Luís Oliveira <[email protected]>: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:03 PM, 73budden . <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sorry, I didn't get what you meant :) Anyway, the quesion is still > >> open if the change suggested would break someone's things, so I hope > >> it is not a big harm to give more details. > > > > I suggest we move on to pull request #278 then. Maybe you can start by > > rebasing/merging against latest master? > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- > > Luís Oliveira > > http://kerno.org/~luis/ > > >