Re: finding an implementation of SWANK interface

Hi!
> (defconstant would be slightly
> better, but still I'd rather pursue the other two ideas first. :-(
Maybe deftype? It is quite unlikely that one would ever want to define
a type with the same name as the name of SWANK interface.

2017-12-19 17:36 GMT+03:00, Luís Oliveira <[email protected]>:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:29 PM, 73budden . <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> ... Sadly, it had to be reverted because ran into SBCL's compiler lock.
>>> Perhaps you can come up with a solution?
>>
>> No. I'm trying to do some SBCL hacking, but I'm (yet) not experienced
>> enough to fix such things.
>
> I wonder if we can play with compute-applicable-method to force
> compilation of the interfaces/implementations ahead of time?
> <https://github.com/guicho271828/inlined-generic-function> might hold
> some tips on how to do that. This might a fun project if you'd like to
> explore the MOP.
>
> Martin's idea is promising too.
>
> Regarding your patch, I really dislike defining special variables
> without the earmuffs. I've been bitten by such variables in the past
> and it's quite annoying and confusing. (defconstant would be slightly
> better, but still I'd rather pursue the other two ideas first. :-(
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Luís Oliveira
> http://kerno.org/~luis/
>