Re: Pure CL unit tests

Red,

No objections whatsoever. I like Fiasco, FiveAM and RT, but feel free to
suggest something else. swank/tests/*.lisp seems like the obvious spot,
even though we have a couple of Scheme implementations of swank. The
swank/tests system can live inside swank.asd perhaps.

What do you think? Feel free to suggest an alternative layout or test
framework.

Cheers,
Luís

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 04:57 Red Daly <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm modifying swank-c-p-c.lisp to complete "c:m-v-b" to
> cl:multiple-value-bind, and I would like to add a few unit tests for the
> swank-c-p-c code. There are only .el tests as of now, so perhaps there are
> opinions about including Common Lisp tests in the project.
>
> Are there any objections to adding Common Lisp tests?
>
> If so, does anyone have preferences for CL tests? (e.g., choice of
> library, file layout)
>