Re: License for Slime

So-called "public domain" might be more complex, but that doesn't stop
the QPX team from actively using it.

>
> Dear Slime maintainers,
> 
> I would like to contribute some code to the project, but my employer
> (Google) will only permit you to do so if the project is licensed
> under an OSI-approved license (https://opensource.org/licenses). I'm
> not a lawyer, but my understanding is that "public domain" code is
> more complex legally than code released under one of the OSI licenses.> 
> Would the authors consider adding such a license to the project in a
> LICENSE file?> 
> Best,
> Red


--
Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.