Re: slime meta-dot in ASDF sources [cross-post from ASDF-devel]
Stas Boukarev <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Jul 2019 14:08:29 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.slime.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF63=10UjtTKo0cST846cd7KDoVGeXqzhMu0Q7otfQF+WrgX0Q@mail.gmail.com> |
The macros like with-upgradability transform the code erasing any links to the original source, making it impossible to locate. On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:47 AM Mark H. David <[email protected]> wrote: > > [The main ASDF dev Robert Goldman answered this partly in ASDF-devel mailing list, but in doing so led me to believe the SLIME devs would know more, hence the crosspost. -MHD] > > > How do ASDF developers using emacs with SLIME deal with doing meta-dot (meta-.) on function names in ASDF sources. Out of the box, mostly when I meta-. just goes to one big top-level form that starts like this > > (with-upgradability () > (define-condition invalid-source-registry (invalid-configuration warning) > Thanks for clues, > -Mark >