Re: freeze for sbcl-2.5.10

Christophe Rhodes via Sbcl-devel <[email protected]>
writes:

> Paul Dietz wrote:
>
>> Code coverage in sbcl itself would be very interesting to me.  It
>> would give me a handle on how well random testing (or, really, any
>> testing) is hitting the code.
>
> OK, well, time to experiment :-)

And now, time for review.

I believe the commit at
https://github.com/csrhodes/sbcl/commit/01bb5344251a01217f4395099f77ddd31301fb30
is basically ready.  There's still an unsolved incompatibility with
--sb-show, and a couple of other hacks in some scripts, but I have built
SBCL with coverage, run the test suite to collect coverage information,
and merged all the resulting data (ahem, some 2GB of text files...)  to
produce a coverage report for the whole (ok, not .test.sh) of the test
suite.

There's more to be done!  Reading the reports, and taking action.  But,
before that, any reviews of the commit above would be welcome.

Thanks,

Christophe