Re: [Sbcl-commits] master: Process smashed weak hash-table cells more quickly

Douglas Katzman via Sbcl-devel <[email protected]> Sun, 7 Dec 2025 20:49:24 -0500

Newsgroups	gmane.lisp.steel-bank.devel
Message-ID	<CAOrNaszcQHkomC1mLXSkw9SCKavUOx5OwTFE_iK5eV2t8N5_Dw@mail.gmail.com>

Well, who would have guessed that this declaration in adaptive-equal-hash
is wrong.  SBCL won't build with it taken out, because apparently it
depended on being able to be incorrectly called from findhash-weak. I guess
that how it adapts depends on how many entries are in a table, and my
change caused some different behavior there.  I thought I was going crazy
until I decided to try removing declarations that inhibited safety

(declare (optimize speed (sb-c::verify-arg-count 0)))

_______________________________________________
Sbcl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel